Portable mortgages have recently become a major topic of discussion, especially following public comments from Director Pulte. With so much attention on the idea, it is important to understand the real background behind it and the thoughtful work that has gone into developing a practical framework.
You can read Joe Tirone’s original LinkedIn post here to see his full message to the public.
The concept first emerged in early 2024 during work with RainproofNYC, a collaboration led by Amy Chester that brought together community and city agency experts focused on storm resilience. During these sessions, Joe introduced the idea as a way to support homeowners in high risk areas who may consider voluntary buyouts but feel unable to give up their low mortgage rates. As national housing conditions shifted, the idea quickly showed broader potential.
Millions of homeowners currently feel stuck because of historically low mortgage rates. This lock in effect has contributed to some of the slowest home sale activity in years. A portable mortgage would allow households to move without sacrificing the rate they already have, helping unlock mobility and addressing one of the major barriers in today’s housing market.
Some believe portability would unfairly benefit certain borrowers, but this view overlooks the large share of buyers who pay cash for their homes. Allowing middle income homeowners to keep their existing rate simply gives them a fair chance to compete. These buyers typically purchase in the most affordable price ranges and do not drive prices upward.
Concerns about impacts on mortgage backed securities also deserve context. Experts who have reviewed the idea closely note that long term risk remains relatively stable because many rate locked homeowners are unlikely to sell without a program like this. The U S model under discussion is also very different from international systems, making many comparisons unreliable.
Joe, together with Buddy Piszel and a team of specialists, has spent almost two years building a complete and responsible framework. The team has consulted with environmental leaders, mortgage experts, financial analysts, and capital market professionals, and has been in communication with federal housing entities. The model reflects extensive study and collaborative refinement.
The attention around portable mortgages presents an opportunity for informed discussion. The idea is not sudden and not untested. It is the result of long term research shaped by real market conditions and community needs. As interest continues to grow, thoughtful dialogue will help guide this concept toward responsible implementation.